that mean we ban FIIs to prevent stock market frauds?
Im not saying that. In the context of higher FDI in insurance, Im saying big global insurance firms got caught doing what they shouldnt have been doing. So we need to be a bit cautious. There is a time for everything, a political environment. I spoke of labour market reforms in 2001, but nothing happened since the time wasnt right.
Will we able to get other bills through, the Banking Regulation Act for instance?
It can go through if the government agrees to a voting cap of 26% irrespective of the level of shareholding.
So youll allow this bill through, which will allow RBI to start processing bank licence applications?
There are 12 pieces of legislation that the Standing Committee on Finance has given its view on, and 11 of these havent even been brought before Parliament, and that includes the Companies Bill, so dont lay everything at the Oppositions doorand may I reiterate the Standing Committee has more UPA members than Opposition ones.
You say the government is changing the goalposts. What does that mean?
The DTC is a good example. The Standing Committee made a lot of suggestions on GAAR, but Pranab didnt wait to even consider these and just went ahead. Now, his successor has asked Dr Parthasarathi Shome to give a report on this, and we read hell send a note to the PM on this in 10 days. Where does the Standing Committee come in on this?
In the case of the Companies Bill, we gave our suggestions but the government then said it had done another set of consultations and changed the bill, but no one came to the Standing Committee. In the case of the GST, we discussed the Constitutional Amendment and I wanted to give our report by July 27. Due to the turmoil in the finance ministry, this couldnt be done. But the government is once again talking to the Empowered Committee of state finance ministers We dont know whether we should look at the Constitutional Amendment or whether some new thing has to be looked at. In the Land Acquisition Bill, the Standing Committee looked at one thing, and now the government is proposing something else after Sonia Gandhi wanted a different formula for the number of people who need to agree before land is acquired.
What has been the Standing Committees view on retrospective taxation?
The Standing Committee didnt