On behalf of the BJP, party leader and chairman of the standing committee on finance Yashwant Sinha said, I can tell you we will oppose the Banking Laws Amendment Bill if the government insists on retaining the clause that allows banks to invest in commodity futures. Sinha, who was speaking at the Express Groups Idea Exchange programme on Thursday, said this in response to finance minister P Chidambaram's statement that the government had reached an agreement with opposition parties to pass the Bill in Parliament, and that he had discussed the matter with BJP leaders Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj who understood the urgency to pass various reform Bills.
Sinha reiterated his stated position that a new clause which changes the very nature of a Bill could not be inserted after the standing committee had deliberated on it. Also, it is irrelevant whether the clause has been okayed by some other committee because the Bill was sent to the standing committee on finance, the BJP leader said, in response to the government position that allowing banks into commodity futures had been cleared by the standing committee on consumer affairs last December.
It was up to the government, he said, to put the Bill to vote, but he commented that there was a very large common position on the issue in the Opposition. Asked if the fact that the regulator in commodity markets was seen to be relatively weaker than those in the stock or currency markets banks are allowed to operate in the futures section of these markets was an issue, Sinha answered in the affirmative saying that could be a problem.
Sinha defended his partys position that when it came to power, it would reverse the decision to allow FDI in multi-brand retail. We believe, he said, as the government has said, that this is an executive decision, and executive decisions can be reversed. If FDI in multi-brand retail was an executive decision, why was it put to vote? Because executive decisions can be voted on, he said. Sinha added that the history of reforms in India has been that various decisions taken by different governments had been changed later. The NDAs Balco residual stake sale to Anil Agarwal being turned down by the UPA is a case in point.
Though Sinha said his insurance Bill had originally wanted a 23% stake for FII/NRI/OCB in addition to 26% FDI, he said