Land economics: What Rahul Gandhi needs to know

Apr 28 2014, 08:30 IST
Comments 0
Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi during an election rally in Botad, Gujarat. (PTI) Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi during an election rally in Botad, Gujarat. (PTI)
SummaryRahul Gandhi has waded into land pricing issue, a subject he would have been well advised not to rake up.

Rahul Gandhi has waded into the subject of land pricing, a subject he would have been well advised not to rake up, as the Congress party carries the maximum baggage here.

There is just no industry prior to 2006, which has bought land from the state at even close to market rates, in Gujarat or any other state. It was this year when the UPA government fast- tracked land buying through the SEZ Act. The furore it unleashed, begun corrections in pricing of land. But till today, no land sales mediated by any state has been at market prices, neither for public-private partnerships nor for SEZs.

We did an intensive survey of free sale land prices in Haryana and Madhya Pradesh for the past 30 years. Data showed the same evidence. In Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh dotted with coal mines and power projects prices, land prices mediated by the state have begun to correct only in the new century but is still well below the market rates.

In Delhi, the land for the airport was given at Rs 100 by the Congress government. If one trawls the records of each state government, similar gems will tumble out. Yet as The Indian Express has pointed out, these sales are neither illegal, nor were the prices the chief attraction for entrepreneurs. Giving away land for a song was the norm across all parties straddling the political spectrum but if just getting the plots were so lucrative to set up an industry, India would have been riding an industrial revolution by now.

But further back in history, it is the Congress government under Indira Gandhi which erased the Right to Property from the Constitution in 1976. If Rahul flips through the debate then, and those around the celebrated Minerva Mills case a little later, he would have known the Right was dropped because the state felt it was being used by people to block land acquisition for projects by the government. Compared to the price the state-led development projects paid for land, Adani SEZ rates would seem a king’s ransom.

So post 2006, all the state governments have woken up to the need to provide fair price for land they buy. Here again, though the Congress had a good rehab model from Haryana run by its own party, it crafted a totally unworkable Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act that will only create a towering

Single Page Format
Ads by Google
Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...