Lokpal as law

Dec 20 2013, 02:20 IST
Comments 0
SummaryThe isolation of the Samajwadi Party, which staged a walkout during the vote, has been pointed out by the newspapers.

The passage of the lokpal bill in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday has been welcomed by most newspapers. In its lead story (December 18), Aziz-ul-Hind draws satisfaction from the fact that the bill was passed after a six-hour discussion. Almost all papers have highlighted that it has been passed with near unanimity, ranging from the BJP on the right to the CPM on the left of the political spectrum. The isolation of the Samajwadi Party, which staged a walkout during the vote, has been pointed out by the newspapers. Inquilab, Rashtriya Sahara and Hamara Samaj wrote elaborately on the exchange of letters between Anna Hazare and Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, highlighting the new bonhomie between the two, something that might show some significant results in the months to come. On December 19, Rashtriya Sahara wrote that other than the “strong will of the government” what’s crucial is the “creation of consciousness among people” to fight corruption.


According to a commentary in multi-edition daily Sahafat (December 8), “The government has made certain changes in the draft of this bill in view of the strong opposition from the BJP and rightwing Hindu organisations. The objective of this law was earlier said to be an end to violence against religious and linguistic minorities. Now the objective has been changed to merely controlling violence. The Centre has also given up its earlier proposal to form a national authority for fixing accountability of government officers in cases of communal riots and their investigation. Now this task would be assigned to national and state human rights commissions.” The paper adds: “If the media, non-Muslim activists and courts outside Gujarat were not involved, all records of the Gujarat riots of 2002 would have been destroyed due to the patronage given to the rioters by the state government. In such situations, the intervention of and strict action by the Central government is imperative.”

Aziz-ul-Hind, edited by Aziz Burney, in its editorial on December 8, writes: “If the BJP is opposing this bill, it can be understood. But what about parties claiming to be secular? West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has secular views and does everything to give solace to Muslims. But even her thinking on this is not different from the BJP’s. If the argument of the secularists against the bill — that it provides for intervention by the Centre in matters of concern to states,

Single Page Format
Ads by Google

More from Op-Ed

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...