Amid high drama, Arvind Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and other members of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) were today released by a Delhi court after they appeared before it following summonses for alleged involvement in rioting cases here last year.
The court released Kejriwal, Bhushan, Manish Sisodia and 23 others on an undertaking that they will appear before it to face trial in the case after they refused to seek bail before it.
Bhushan objected to the use of words released on bail in the initial order which was later changed by the judge by dropping the word bail from the order.
The court room at the Patiala House was jampacked with the supporters and members of AAP who shouted no bail, no bail while the order was pronounced.
All the aforesaid accused are released, subject to their signing this order as acknowledgement of their undertaking to this court that they will face trial, appear on all the dates of hearing and abide by the conditions imposed by this court, during trial, Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) Jay Thareja said and fixed the matter for further hearing on February 23.
Kejriwal and other AAP members appeared before the court following summonses issued against them in connection with three separate cases for allegedly violating prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of the CrPC during their protest on the coal blocks allocation scam in August last year at the Prime Minister's residence and other places here.
During the day's proceedings, they told the court they will not seek bail in the case as the police has filed false cases against them to harass and curb their protest.
The magistrate, however, said he was bound to grant them bail in the case.
The law says if the accused appears before the court after filing of chargesheet in such cases, accused should be granted bail. I need at least a surety. I cannot violate the law of the land, the magistrate said and told the accused that he would conduct an expeditious trial in the case.
In response, Kejriwal told the court that they respect the law of the land but whether to take bail is their right and they have decided not to take bail in the case.
We respect the law and your (magistrate's) position. Our only weapon is truth and we are on that way only. We deliberately violated Sec 144 and we are ready to face the punishment. We have decided not to