US may leave no troops in Afghanistan

Jan 09 2013, 09:56 IST
Comments 0
The US now has 66,000 troops in Afghanistan, down from a peak of about 100,000 as recently as 2010. (Reuters) The US now has 66,000 troops in Afghanistan, down from a peak of about 100,000 as recently as 2010. (Reuters)
SummaryThis defies Pentagon view that thousands of troops may be needed to keep lid on al-Qaeda.

law. Karzai has resisted, while emphasizing his need for large-scale US support to maintain an effective security force after 2014.

In announcing last month in Kabul that he had accepted Obama's invitation to visit this week, Karzai made plain his objectives.

"Give us a good army, a good air force and a capability to project Afghan interests in the region,'' Karzai said, and he would gladly reciprocate by easing the path to legal immunity for US troops.

Karzai is scheduled to meet Thursday with Panetta at the Pentagon and with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at the State Department.

Without explicitly mentioning immunity for US troops, Obama's top White House military adviser on Afghanistan, Doug Lute, told reporters Tuesday that the Afghans will have to give the US certain "authorities'' if it wants US troops to remain.

"As we know from our Iraq experience, if there are no authorities granted by the sovereign state, then there's not room for a follow-on US military mission,'' Lute said. He was referring to 2011 negotiations with Iraq that ended with no agreement to grant legal immunity to US troops who would have stayed to help train Iraqi forces. As a result, no US troops remain in Iraq.

David Barno, a former commander of US forces in Afghanistan and now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, wrote earlier this week that vigorous debate has been under way inside the administration on a "minimalist approach'' for post-2014 Afghanistan.

In an opinion piece for on Monday, Barno said the "zero option'' was less than optimal but "not necessarily an untenable one.'' Without what he called the stabilizing influence of US troops, Barno cautioned that Afghanistan could "slip back into chaos.''

Rhodes said Obama is focused on two main outcomes in Afghanistan: ensuring that the country does not revert to being the al-Qaeda haven it was prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and getting the government to the point where it can defend itself.

"That's what guides us, and that's what causes us to look for different potential troop numbers _ or not having potential troops in the country,'' Rhodes said.

He predicted that Obama and Karzai would come to no concrete conclusions on international military missions in Afghanistan beyond 2014, and he said it likely would be months before Obama decides how many US troops _ if any he wants to keep there.

Rhodes said Obama remains committed to further

Single Page Format
Ads by Google

More from World

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...