Shares of Maruti Suzuki slumped to a one-month low on Friday as brokerages raised further concerns after
the company issued clarifications on the proposed Suzuki-owned plant in Gujarat. Shares of the automaker fell 5.33% intra-day on Friday, before closing 4.54% lower at Rs 1,586.30.
On Thursday, Maruti Suzuki in a release titled ‘Information on Gujarat Project’ gave clarifications on what price the cars would be sold to Maruti Suzuki, on post-contract scenario and the capex requirements. “The capex needs of SMG (Suzuki Motor Gujarat) would be met by i) the depreciation amount available with the subsidiary, ii) by an amount generated as net surplus from the car pricing and iii) by Suzuki Motor Corp infusing fresh equity, to the extent necessary,” the company release said.
According to brokerages, the disclosures are negative for the stock. CLSA in a note said that now Maruti will fund part of the future capex at Gujarat through a mark-up in transfer pricing, while an earlier communication suggested additional funds would be put in by Suzuki. The deal would impact margins and earnings growth post FY18 for Maruti. “Maruti’s margins on vehicles in Gujarat plant will be average 6% lower than at Haryana plant (13%),” it said.
Meanwhile, analysts feel Suzuki shareholders are likely to benefit from the Gujarat plant. “From an earlier guidance of zero profit for Suzuki, Maruti now says it needs to make a profit to fund future capex. Even if Suzuki pumps in additional equity, costing will only fall marginally. More troubles for minority shareholders are exposed, while super-rich profitability and return on equity (ROE) are expected for Suzuki,” CIMB said in a note.
Analysts question why Maruti Suzuki kept away from investing in the plant since the company sits on Rs 6,000 crore worth of cash as on December quarter. “According to the above, i and ii (referring to the company release) are funding by Maruti Suzuki for future capex; iii is funding by Suzuki. Given Maruti Suzuki’s surplus reserves, we are still not clear on why Suzuki ownership is required in this structure,” Morgan Stanley analysts Binay Singh and Yashesh Mukhi said in a report.
On January 28, while announcing the move, the company said the board took the decision as “implementing the expansion through a 100% Suzuki subsidiary would result in substantial financial benefits to Maruti Suzuki, and its minority shareholders”. Then the scrip plunged 9.4% in intra-day trade. Year-to-date, the